您现在的位置是:电影

傲慢与偏见电影 影评,

2020-10-29 15:10电影

简介《与偏见》这部小说无疑是女作家简·奥最受的作品之一,原著女之间微妙感情的适度把握令人叹为观止,因此自从1813年小说正式出版以来,拥趸无数,备受追捧,更是数次被改编成不同版本的影视作品。2005年,英 ...

  《与偏见》这部小说无疑是女作家简·奥最受的作品之一,原著女之间微妙感情的适度把握令人叹为观止,因此自从1813年小说正式出版以来,拥趸无数,备受追捧,更是数次被改编成不同版本的影视作品。2005年,英国导演乔·怀特遵从着“原汁原味”的法则将这部经典名著再次搬上了大银幕,用传统的故事叙述和全新的视觉表现,将十八,十九世纪的英国勾勒成一幅流动着的社会风情画。影片华丽的场景,美丽的田园风光和优美典雅的音乐,不仅将人们带回了那个充满典雅与高贵的纯真年代,也让我们领略到纯英国文学衍生出的深厚魅力。   或许,现实中的生活本来就太过沉重,人人都想有个做梦的机会,而影片《傲慢与偏恰好给了我们这样一个机会,让智慧得以与美貌并重,使得平凡的我们在获得一份轻松愉悦的心情同时,也能看到一点对情感的希望,从而更加努力地去找寻属于自己的幸福。而只要人类存在,恋爱婚嫁就是永远的主题,演不尽的,又何止是一版版的《傲慢与偏见》。相信我们还会对十年乃至五十年后的《傲慢与偏见》满怀热情和期待。

-

下面是更多关于傲慢与偏见电影 影评的问答

傲慢与偏见电影影评

It is a classical film that is really worth seeing .

The cinematograpy was beautiful and eyescapttivating.

what shocked me most was the heroine's spirt,she was dspendent and self-respect.

As a famale ,we may have not a good looking,we may not have gorgeous dress,but we must learn to be embarrass and behave.

电影《傲慢与偏见》的观后感 ,要求对电影的艺术性方面感受多一些。字数2000字左右。

Any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen, when this words about Jane Austen given by Mark Twin first came upon to me, I was, just in your expectation, a little bit surprised. Gradually, however, when I know more about the characteristics of her works, I think the judgement of Mark Twin makes sense in some degree. Especially after I have finished her work Pride and Prejudice and compared it with the contemporary production The Red and the Black written by Stendhal. Less reflection and exposure on social conflicts among different classes is a big pity for Austen’s works, as well as for the readers. Still, however, Austen’s unique interpretation towards marriage is the distinguished feature of her literary accomplishment. And I want to give some reflection on the different kinds of relationships and marriages in Pride and Prejudice.

Five different types of relationships or marriages, as far as I am concerned, are presented in this book.

The first type, undoubtedly, is the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley. They met at a party and almost fell in love with each other just after their first encounter. Bingley’s wealth and courtesy, Jane’s beauty and tenderness, and the similarities in their personality are all the factors that contribute to the relationship. So, though I believe, actually, there is some kind of love between the young lady and the gentleman, it is not the pure and true love, their combination is not for no intention but for some certain desire. So I would like to call their relationship as “Secular Love”.

Contrasting to the relationship between Jane and Mr. Bingley, the marriage between Charlotte and Mr.Collins is much less romantic, or no romance at all. One is the Cinderella in reality equipped with no prince, the other is a priest, old and ugly. Their marriage, of course, has no love but compromise. Even Elizabeth thinks “Charlotte the wife of Mr. Collins, was a most humiliating picture!” But what could she do? Just as she said, she is not romantic and she asks only a comfortable home, and this is within Mr. Collins ability. Comparing with being a 27-year-old burden to her family,at least for her, marrying Mr. Collins is the best choice. So as for them, I call “Rational Love” or rather------ “Rational Combination”.

Another couple is Mrs. Bennet and Mr. Bennet. Just in the first chapter, I wondered why two people with such different characteristics could live together for 23 years. The wonder disappeared when the explanation was offered by Austen in Chapter 42 about Mr. Bennet’s attitude towards his wife. Captivated by youth and beauty, he married her and very early in their marriage, after knowing the disposition of her, ended his affection and used her ignorance to contribute his amusement, having impropriety of his behavior as a husband. Neither for Mr. Bennet nor for Mrs. Bennet this marriage is quite fair or contented, but both of them should pay, and had already paid the bill of their “Hasty Love”.

Lydia’s relationship with Wickham, to some extent, is similar with her parents’. Mr. Bennet was captivated by the beauty of his wife and Lydia was fascinated by the handsome appearance of Wickham. Compared with her parents’ marriage, however, Lydia’s relationship with Wickham would only turn out a much more unpleasant one, for their marriage is based on the fulfillment of vanity and the desire of property. So I consider their relationship as “Orectic Incorporation”

And finally here comes the relationship between Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. When I first finished the movie of Pride and Prejudice, I still wondered why there is a love flame between them. One is so proud and the other full of prejudice, but when I read more details about this work, the answer has emerged. “Love”, a word we are so familiar with, but what is love? In Austen’s work, I gradually know that love is not just as abstract as we often regard. Take Elizabeth, for example, her love for Daisy is based on two things: respect and gratitude. She respects his valuable qualities: nobility and kindness, and even Wickham had done something so bad to him and his sister, he still didn’t blame him before others or let him lose all dignity in public. Also, she is grateful to Mr. Darcy, for his love, for his forgiveness about her bad manners when she rejected him, for his help to her sister’s marriage and her family’s fame. And finally, these turned out her attachment, affection and love for him. As for Darcy, his attention to Elizabeth was first on her eyes, full of liveliness, thoughts and pursuits and unlike any other ladies, she is such a unique girl that she didn’t flatter him at all, so for him she is so extraordinary and attractive. And Elizabeth got his respect and love because of her own independence, liveliness and uniqueness. And I regard their relationship as “Spirit Love”.

Austen’s attitude towards marriage, love, status and property can still be used as a reference. Nowadays, fast food culture derives fast-food-style love, although we are in the era of fast changes, it’s better for us to love rationally and independently. Hope everyone has his real, unique love.

为什么电影《傲慢与偏见》的评价很好?

每个人都在做着选只不过有些人逐认自己和身边人,有些人还雾中。这是电影《傲慢与偏见》传达的核心价值观,对于伊丽莎白来说,最幸福的时刻应该就是逐渐发现身边人原来才是命中人,他们的善良如此相似,他们的爱情如此真挚。

这部电影改编自19世纪初英国女小说家简·奥斯汀的同名小说,因为小说本身就是世界名著,因此电影的改编和影视化显得特别重要。如何将这个人尽皆知的故事搬上荧屏,并令其出彩,导演需要花费一番心思。

事实上,电影版的《傲慢与偏见》很好的还原了书中的情节,甚至是众多细节,都对应做出了调整。故事讲述出生在英国乡村的伊丽莎白家来了新的邻居宾格来和他的朋友达西,在舞会上,这两位富有魅力的男士对于伊丽莎白的姐妹都产生了强大的吸引力。宾格来和伊丽莎白的姐姐简·班纳特互生情愫;达西对善良聪明的伊丽莎白产生了好感。但是在相处中,充满个性的伊丽莎白却不认为达西适合自己,因此对他的暗示不为所动。但随着故事的发展,社会环境的变化,以及和达西的渐渐熟识。伊丽莎白最终认清了身边这个人,被他所打动,真正的坠入了爱河。

电影《傲慢与偏见》评价很好,表现在多方面。首先是众多出色的演员,他们将书中角色的个性表现的很贴近原著,甚至拥有超乎原著的复杂人性。尤其是凯拉·奈特莉饰演的伊丽莎白,呈现出了19世界英国女性的独立意志,敢于拒绝爱情,也敢于接受真爱,不会盲目跟从,而是选择遵循内心感动。这对于那个时代的女性来说,无疑是叛逆但最可贵的品质。马修·麦克费登饰演的达西,则将一个情感真挚、性格温和、为人善良的西方绅士所有美好的品质都一一呈现给世人,让观众忍不住夸赞这才是男神。其他演员例如唐纳德·萨瑟兰、凯瑞·穆里根都表现的很出色。

这部电影评价高的另一个原因就是主旨性,小说能成为世界名著,因为作者将当时的社会现实通过流行的感伤小说和独特的写作手法呈现给观众。而电影保留了这种艺术性,又增强了电影本身的价值观,强化女性的选择权利和追求自由的权利,大胆的塑造了新时代女性的特征。这让这部电影有了超越经典的可能,人人都能从中得到感悟,这是它的魅力。

<<傲慢与偏见>>的电影影评怎么写?

这里不止情,还有傲慢与偏见……

,如果只这个故事简述给别人,或是只把爱分抽取出来再按按好莱坞的方式拍出来,那我想这会是一部10分钟的短片,——一个家有5个女孩,未出嫁。突然有两个邻居搬进,并举办了舞会,在一次大胆的表白后,成就了两对互许终身的情侣。我并没有贬低好莱坞的意思,因为那种模式也同样可以让人感到幸福,就像《恋恋笔记本》,影片开场不到十分钟大家相爱,然后是长达40多分钟的缠绵……看这部片就想再吃一块甜甜的巧克力一样,这不能不让看的人对爱情产生向往。但《傲慢与偏见》却不知有这些,那些简简单单的爱情被溶在了一杯浓浓的咖啡里,尝起来有别样的滋味,那就是傲慢,与偏见。

对,正是有了傲慢与偏见,才使得这部片别有风味。两个相爱的人,宾利和简,因为宾利的一点点傲慢,和达西的曾经的偏见差点没走到一起,而其实两人如果一开始就表白,就像那个表亲柯林斯对伊丽莎白做的一样,他们很快就会走到一起。而至于伊丽莎白和达西,他们的矛盾产生就是源于达西一开始给伊丽莎白的“傲慢”的感觉,而中间宾利小姐和达西姨妈对伊丽莎白的偏见,也加深了达西和伊丽莎白的误会。所以,当你还在因为片名而怀疑这部片子时,请别再犹豫。请记住,对于爱情题材,开放的美国人会选择爱情是否忠诚,是否浪漫作为戏剧冲突,而保守一点的英国人(特别还是简奥斯丁生活的年代的英国人)则会选择人与人之间的傲慢与偏见作戏剧冲突。

如果你看过原著,你就会体会得到这种傲慢与偏见有多么深。小说中宾利小姐是个偏见很大的人,她处处显出自己的高贵,在达西面前不停的贬低着伊丽莎白,说得她一无是处,可惜这个小说前10章中如此重要的人物,电影只是一笔带过了,不过还好电影深入刻画了另两个重要人物,贝内特太太和达西姨妈。贯穿始终,我们无时无刻不感受到贝内特太太的阶级观念,无论是他在舞会上讨论夏洛特的美丑与身家,在追逐有钱女婿时的积极,小女儿私奔和成婚这两种状态下截然不同的反应。不可否认,贝内特太太爱他的女儿,不过这好像都是建立在一种利益关系上的。还有达西阿姨,虽然只有两场戏,但两次对伊丽莎白的严苛质问,都让人感到她,乃至当时整个英伦上层阶级的傲慢与偏见。当然这也要感谢布兰达·布莱斯和朱迪丹奇的精彩演出。

我相信,当最后一切误解都消除时,傲慢与偏见也就显得不那么重要了,我们关注的也就只是达西和伊丽莎白的结局,当在傲慢和偏见中长大的达西,开场时还显得很傲慢的达西,从草地中走来,迎着清晨的太阳,向伊丽莎白求婚时,与伊丽莎白额头在阳光中相碰时,我们观众感受到的,是一种无与伦比的幸福。

奈特利的微笑甜美无比,说句实话,我没看过她其他的作品,包括大名鼎鼎的加勒比,但我想我确实开始认同这位演员了,他没有斯嘉丽的丰满,尼可(冷山中)的白皙,以及瑞秋的甜妞气质,但我想她的笑确实让观众感到了幸福,快乐,至少对我来讲。她把我心中的的那位伊丽莎白描绘了出来,也许当我从新翻开《傲慢与偏见》时,我会有不一样的感受。虽然说书中的伊丽莎白也有那么一点傲慢,而电影中没有表现出来,但我想奈特利已经诠释了一种属于她的伊丽莎白了。至于饰演达西的马修·麦克费登,他长得真像史派西,希望他以后能变得和史派西一样好,期待他的表现。

最后来说一下电影技法,可能老罗听了会感到反对,但没办法,我没看过《12怒汉》,尽管听说了很多遍《12怒汉》中的长镜头很经典(同样听说《历劫佳人》的开头的长镜头也很厉害)。但我还是觉得,在我看那些片之前,《傲慢与偏见》中的长镜头是最棒的,长长的镜头不仅没有把影片节奏拖慢,反而增加了影片舒缓,柔和的感觉,让人感到很舒服。其中最令人印象深刻的长镜头当属开头那个和舞会那个了。开头的长镜头开始与伊丽莎白进入家门,镜头随着不同人物的进入跟到不同的地方,期间不觉的把背景,各个贝内特家的人物的性格都粗略的介绍了一遍。这个镜头漂亮就漂亮在独特的风景和巧妙的设计,可以说是我见到过的最巧妙的影片开头了。

在这就是舞会的长镜头了,我留意了一下,整个镜头长达3分钟,期间镜头在舞会间貌似随意的走动,几乎每一个主要人物都有拍到。我认为该镜头独特之处就在于,镜头在游走间并没有忽略人物之间的关系和人物的对话,3分钟的镜头把此时各种人物复杂的心态都展现出来,体现了社会普遍存在的一种傲慢与偏见(集中体现在达西小姐和贝斯特太太身上),紧扣了主题。同时也为接下来故事的发展做了铺垫,而这3分钟中演员演得都很自如,表情丰富,肢体语言恰到好处,使得观众一点也没有走神。而这个镜头漂亮就集中体现在,导演那无与伦比的调度能力上,3分钟,镜头还能如此自然地穿梭来穿梭去,把每个人毫不落下的拍出来而不显得镜头冗长,像纪录片一样,这真是一个很令人惊奇的事,而其中伊丽莎白出现两次,中间隔了一段,想必中间还有一段路可跑,这也应该也为这个镜头增添了难度。

值得一提的是,这两个长镜头每个单独拿出来放回原著看都有3到4章的篇幅,而拍出来的效果完全还原了文意,这既为后面描写冲突赢得了篇幅,又使得前面的内容看起来自然有趣,这真是这部影片一个极其成功的地方,也体现了编导的才华。

简奥斯丁赋予的思考;

编导扎实的功底;

演员们自然流露的表演;

使得这部片成为一部佳片,是我心目中的经典。

感谢《傲慢与偏见》陪我度过美好的一晚。

Tags:傲慢与偏见电影 影评,电影《傲慢与偏见》精彩影评,